The names of other SPD figures – such as Sigmar Gabriel, Stephan Weil, Manuela Schwesig, Franziska Giffey or Kevin Kühnert – do not appear on the list of applicants.

What does the delegates’ meeting teach about the party? 1. The management duo made a false start. Both give weak speeches at the party congress without major visions.

Her many references to Willy Brandt and the social democratic promise of promotion are the evocation of a golden yesterday. More minimum wages, more climate protection and more government spending are unlikely to bring new voters. It is just as difficult to imagine that Saskia Esken or Norbert Walter-Borjans can sweep away the citizens of the marketplaces in most of the east. To a large extent, the region will remain a problem area for the SPD. They support a diaper-soft lead motion for the grand coalition, the downsizing of the executive board fails due to the party’s powerlessness to stand a candidacy for a fight. Klara Geywitz from Brandenburg, who was defeated in the struggle for party chairmanship, was given a deputy post – she had previously been thrown out of the Potsdam state parliament.

In the board elections, with Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, Berlin’s Governing Mayor Michael Müller, the Saxon state chief Martin Dulig and the party left Ralf Stegner, a number of party sizes fail in the first ballot, so that Esken take a warning to the microphone and then the party conference for more than an hour for internal parties Consultations must be interrupted. Müller and Stegner then withdraw their candidacies. Both are – besides personal animosities – victims of regional arithmetic. Your regional associations hold vice positions.

Dulig and Maas make it in the second ballot. It has been said and written many times before, but at this point it must be remembered once again: The most striking unique selling point of the applicant duo Saskia Esken and Norbert Walter-Borjans towards Olaf Scholz and Klara Geywitz was their demand, the To leave GroKo, or to attach very ambitious conditions to its continued existence. However, the two of them collected all of this shortly after their nomination by the party base. Would you have been elected if you had withdrawn this request before the vote?

Or would the party base have decided in favor of Scholz and Geywitz? Esken and Walter-Borjans neither have a vote on remaining in the GroKo, nor do they formulate – as announced – clear conditions for the Union in their lead motion. This question, and it is remarkable, does not really play a role at the party congress.

There was no significant resistance either in the debate about the candidates for the presidency or in the debate on the key proposal. But aren’t the delegates mad? Doesn’t anyone feel fooled? No. The absolutely overwhelming consensus in discussions with the delegates is: That is perfectly fine.english biology essay writing service

There is great understanding that the rhetoric after the election sounds so very different than before. It is said that the SPD has actually achieved a lot in the GroKo. It is said that restraint is wise.

It has been heard that it would be smarter in every way to stay in for the remainder of the legislature. There should be no question of falling over. But that’s exactly what it is. And with this, a tradition is continued at the SPD, which is likely to have a large part in the fact that the party is on the verge of single-mindedness in surveys.

There is no GroKo peace and quiet If you think that the debates about the weal and woe of the grand coalition in the SPD are over, you are vastly mistaken. Whatever the name of the child – renegotiations, updates, discussions – and no matter what the decision is made after the meeting with the Union, in the end there are again the disappointed and frustrated. When the election campaign for 2021 begins in a year at the latest, the withdrawal movements will intensify again and at the same time the many successes behind the anti-GroKo rhetoric will again disappear. The really leaden time in the GroKo is yet to come. “” In the new time “” has chosen the SPD as the motto of its party congress: New is the top duo, new is in large parts the board. But sticking to the GroKo is old.

The revision clause is ultimately for a clear conscience and appeasing the many critics. It will not be the vehicle for leaving the GroKo. The adopted lead proposal bears the signature of the supporters. The fact that the party leaders Saskia Esken and Norbert Walter-Borjans GroKo skeptics have lined up as well as Juso boss Kevin Kühnert is the personified renunciation of a radical turnaround.

The SPD does what it has always done – it bows to requirements and does its service to the fatherland. Don’t mess with the parliamentary group! Before the party congress, there was a rumble through the parliamentary group: For good reasons, the 152 MPs could not have any interest in breaking the coalition, their mandates would then be lost. And so the parliamentary group has evidently exerted “” gentle “” pressure on the leadership appointed before the party congress. This is how it works: Should the party congress decide to leave the GroKo, Chancellor Angela Merkel would then have to put the vote of confidence in the Bundestag.

In this case, the parliamentary group announced that it would give the Chancellor a majority vote of confidence, according to party circles. For the SPD, the break between party and parliamentary group would be a disaster; for the new leadership duo, it might be the greatest possible accident at the beginning of their term in office. Nobody wanted to confirm this scenario by naming them, it remains murmur.

However, the strategy is conclusive and it is not entirely unlikely that the parliamentary group could have put pressure on Esken and Walter-Borjans in this way. The morning after the election, Juso boss Kevin Kühnert took up the issue. He emphasized that the new leadership now has “” very strong support of 100,000 members “”. This is a difference to past party chairmen, who “” have repeatedly questioned the leadership “”, “” also on the part of the parliamentary group “”.

He believes that Esken and Walter-Borjans could now appear with a “” broader back “”. The scenario just described would, however, prove that they made themselves susceptible to blackmail right from the start. 5. Andrea Nahles is still there The former party leader is not at the meeting.

But her name comes up often. In times when former party grandees like Gerhard Schröder or Sigmar Gabriel regularly attack the party sharply, the words of parliamentary group leader Rolf Mützenich are perhaps the most appropriate praise for Nahles, who has completely withdrawn from politics. He thanks “” personally “” for not making any comments from the “” sidelines. But Nahles’ political impulses are still having an effect. At the meeting, the SPD decides on a welfare state concept, which in major parts still comes from it. Unemployed people should therefore be able to receive unemployment benefit I for longer.

After that, instead of Hartz IV, there should be a citizen’s benefit. Breaches of duty should be sanctioned less often. The SPD wants to implement the ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court, according to which the job centers may not reduce the monthly benefits by more than 30 percent. Stricter sanctions for under 25-year-olds and cuts in housing benefits are to be abolished. Employees should have a legal right to further training.

In addition, according to the SPD, the right to mobile work and home office should be enshrined in law in the future. The minimum wage is to be raised to 12 euros in the future. Furthermore, there should be an independent basic child benefit, a citizen’s insurance for care and a stable pension level. The SPD has long spoken about wanting to correct its socio-political mistakes of the past. The welfare state concept is the first tangible step in this direction. One can criticize the party and the delegates’ meeting in many ways.

The accusation that the SPD is not developing any further in its core brand is, however, incorrect. The established ones are not finished yet Olaf Scholz, Franziska Giffey and Hubertus Heil show in their brief appearances in the debates on individual program items how passionate forward-looking verbal contributions are placed. Scholz in particular leaves the impression that at a suitable time he could make a new attempt at a top position. Giffey’s time will come. There are regular whispers about the Red City Hall in Berlin or the Potsdam State Chancellery.

Berlin’s ruling miller received at least one major setback in the committee elections. Heil, Giffey and Scholz are henceforth the Realo wing in the party and have played a decisive role in formulating the main proposal for the GroKo. Heil is party vice and experiences his big moment on the second day: Malu Dreyer introduced the welfare state concept, Heil advertised it in a committed speech.

At the end he stands on the stage and can be celebrated for the acceptance. Source: ntv.de “Andrea Nahles led the SPD for almost two years. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) After SPD politician Andrea Nahles chaired her party and The Social Democrat is now officially resigning her Bundestag mandate. As of November 1, the 49-year-old will be free from any office. Former party and faction leader of the SPD, Andrea Nahles, is now also resigning her Bundestag mandate she wrote to Bundestag President Wolfgang Schäuble, as Nahles reported.

The SPD parliamentary group also confirmed that Nahles will leave the Bundestag on November 1. After that, the 49-year-old wants to reorient herself professionally. She lives in the Eifel and has a daughter.

With one interruption, Nahles had been in the Bundestag since 1998. She has headed the parliamentary group for almost two years since the 2017 federal election. She was also Minister of Labor from 2013 to 2017 and party leader from April 2018 to June 2019. After the disaster of the SPD in the European elections, Nahles came under great pressure – and finally resigned from all top positions : picture alliance / dpa) At first nobody wanted, now the list of applicants for the SPD chief position is slowly becoming confusing: From the elderly ex-MPs to the Nahles-Schreck everything is there shortly before the deadline The search was slow, but is slowly picking up speed.

Until the beginning of September, applicants for the top position in the SPD can venture out of cover and apply for candidacy for party leadership. The list of SPD members who want to take on the position that has been vacant since Andrea Nahles’ spectacular resignation now includes 16 names. In the run-up to the internal party selection process, the future direction of the oldest and largest party in Germany has long been discussed such weighty questions as the survival of the grand coalition. Applicants from the second and third rows line up to strengthen their respective party wing with their application. The political heavyweights of the SPD – with the exception of Finance Minister Olaf Scholz, who is standing with the Potsdam state parliament member Klara Geywitz – have so far been noticeably restrained. In fact, the replacement at the top of the party could change social democratic politics in Germany considerably in the coming years.

Most recently, the member of the Bundestag Karl-Heinz Brunner from Bavaria announced his application. In an interview with the “Augsburger Allgemeine” “, he expressly pointed out how important it is to him that the selection process” “reflects the full diversity of the party.” “Before the regional conferences starting in September to present the candidates, he sees one “Clear overhang of the GroKo opponents and the left-wing party spectrum”, explained the SPD member from Bavaria. According to the report, the 66-year-old wants to start the race without a female co-candidate. He considers the procedure chosen by the party to form pairs of applicants in advance to be “” unfortunate, “said Brunner. In order to obtain the status of nominated candidate, applicants need the support of at least five SPD sub-districts, one SPD district or an SPD state association. Applicants can only take part in the further selection process as candidates when this support is secured.

And this process is tough: from the beginning of September to mid-October, applicants are to introduce themselves to the party base in 23 regional conferences across Germany and explain their ideas about the future party leadership. This internal party election campaign – which will cost a lot of time, energy and money – is intended to do so enable more than 400,000 SPD members to get to know the candidates and their positions better. Who actually comes into question to fill the new SPD leadership should then be determined in a member survey. The party intends to present the results of this survey on October 26th. A mixed-gender dual leadership, such as Gesine Schwan and Ralf Stegner, Nina Scheer and Karl Lauterbach or Simone Lange and Alexander Ahrens, is expressly desired. “” We expressly encourage this, “said the acting SPD leader Thorsten Schäfer-Gümbel at the start of the application period at the beginning of July. Individual candidates are also possible, it said. Who will succeed Andrea Nahles (4th from left) in the office of party chairman?

Except for Olaf Scholz (center) nobody wants to make it out of the SPD leadership – so far (archive picture). (Photo: imago / IPON) In fact, four of the 16 applicants have so far been single-handedly for the top position. Finance Minister Olaf Scholz, so far the only SPD representative from the ranks of the political heavyweights, wants to stand for a dual leadership, but has not yet given a name for the co-candidacy. The names of other SPD figures – such as Sigmar Gabriel, Stephan Weil, Manuela Schwesig, Franziska Giffey or Kevin Kühnert – do not appear on the list of applicants.

However, there is still some time until September 1st. The further process is regulated in detail in a resolution of the party executive committee of June 24th. If in the first member survey “” no team and no individual candidate receive more than 50 percent of the votes “”, there should be “” a further member survey “” in which “” the two teams or individual candidates with the most votes “” are up for vote, as it says in the guidelines for the selection process. It will take months for the leadership question at the SPD to be finally resolved.